across the network: Kyle Brady: Blog  |  Kyle Brady: Fiction  |  Kyle Brady: Status  |  Kyle Brady: Stream  |  Kyle Brady: Projects  |  Kyle Brady: Profile contact
across the internet: on Twitter | on Facebook | more...

Old Content:

Using AI to Determine Writers’ Intent




An article over at Wired talks about how the government is supposedly developing (or perfecting) a form of AI that crawls the internet in order to find articles that "sound" like a terrorist.

Interesting. I wonder: if you write an anti-Bush post on your blog, but in a non-combative fashion, do you appear on the list of "terrorist" authors? How does it determine, exactly, the voice, tone, and intent of the author? Tone is sometimes hard to understand in written form, by humans, so how is an AI program going to do any better?

On the other side of the coin, could this be a step towards "true" AI? Meaning, artificial intelligence that actually learns, adapts, and acts based on a dynamic set of self-created methods and instructions... like, for example, the central computer in the movie "iRobot" with Will Smith.

Government funded projects have a habit of trickling down to the general public, after being declassified, and becoming large fixtures in modern technology and every day life. Just look at the microwave, satellite radio, GPS, regular radio, the Internet, etc. I can imagine, in the near future, a library you can use in your own code (much like the standard C libraries) that allows your program to learn, adapt, and rewrite itself as necessary.

And who says the American government is evil?

Old Content posts are leftovers from a less structured, less civilzed era that are kept for posterity.
Kyle can be found on Twitter and MySpace, or reached via email.

submit to reddit Add to Mixx! Share on Facbeook Retweet
Printable Version Printable Version

More Old Content Pieces

see more...


Commenting Rules

The following is a basic set of rules that are enforced for all commenters.

Any violations of these rules will result in comment deletion, user bans, or both.

  1. No excessively foul language.
  2. No racist remarks.
  3. No SPAMing, unrelated linking, or otherwise unnecessary promotion of outside material.
  4. No trolling.
  5. Be respectful.
  6. Be valuable.
  7. Feel free to respond, argue, or counter-point an article - but do so coherently and intelligently.
  8. Use a personal nickname, commenting account, or moniker. Do not use your business' or website name/account.
  9. Do not trackback/pingback to this post unless your content is relevant.
also available as a standalone page

blog comments powered by Disqus
Kyle Brady: Blog
coherent thoughts on diverse topics


Site Navigation:
About Columns Ethics Rules Contact