Beaming Solar Power From Space

It popped up awhile ago, but it’s back again: the idea to beam collected solar power to Earth.

There’s only a few, shall we say, minor problems with getting this to work, aside from those mentioned in the article:

  • Satellite Position
  • Transfer Mechanism
  • Ownership
  • Defensibility

Satellite Position

Modern times have made the Earth’s rotation as common knowledge, and yet something like this appears. Will the satellite be in a stationary orbit, so as to have contact with the Sun at all times? If so, how do you collect something that is always moving in relation to you? Or will the satellite be orbiting at the same speed as Earth (having a relative velocity of zero)? If so, where is this energy beamed to?

Satellite
Not too close, eh?

One could imagine that, for practical and efficiency reasons, the satellite would remain in a stationary orbit so it would have contact with the Sun at all times (unless it was far enough away that Earth’s shadow was negligible… but we’ll pretend that’s impossible). How would the energy be collected?

Transfer Mechanism

Since we’re assuming the satellite will remain in a stationary orbit, the transfer mechanism to Earth would be very complicated. The most sensible method (since we can’t yet transfer power via radio waves) is a high intensity beam of energy/light, or a laser. That’s all well and good, but the Earth is rotating below the satellite…

Some solutions:

  • a subset of satellites that bounces the laser around the Earth and always targets one specific location
  • a network of something akin to a wireframe, on which the collection mechanism can “slide” around the Earth to receive the transfer
  • a huge line of receivers that encircles the Earth, always having contact from the satellite’s laser at one point on this line

As you can see, there is no easy answer.

Collection
Energy says “Beam me down, Scotty!”

Ownership

Who would own this satellite? The U.S. Government is the one with funding interest at the moment, but what about it’s reality? Do the American energy companies, who already charge exorbitant amounts of money, add this to their energy arsenal? Is it owned by the United Nations, in an effort to be a “global society” and transfer the power around the world? Does it become temporarily “owned” by the country to which it is beaming energy at the moment?

Short of having one of these energy grabbers for each country that wants one (and maybe for each energy company), there will be huge debate, and possible fighting, over an item such as this.

Defensibility

How do you defend a giant satellite that you, as a country or corporation, may come to depend on for energy? Attack rockets and lasers-that-don’t-yet-exist to the satellite, with an auto-targeting computer? What about meteors destroying something that costs so much? What happens when, say, a Chinese satellite is unknowingly armed with missiles comes close… and attacks? Solar flares? The slight “wobble” of Earth? Ground-based attacks? Spaceships? Debris?

SpaceWar
Me R SpaseCatz. Me eet SpaseMise!

My Point

My whole point is this: it sounds like a good idea, and is really cool to think about… but there is no way this can be designed and built without spending alot of money, and causing worldwide problems on many levels.

Maybe you should work on global warming first…

Space-Time Is Nonlinear? NO WAY!

Let me see if I understand this. A guy, named Itzhak Bars, thinks there are 2 “dimensions” of time, which would result in having to add another dimension of space to accommodate some weird equations only a few people in the world are aware of (that’s assuming that your general college physics class sticks to the whole 3-dimensional + gravity thing).

Wow. You’re a genius. Thanks for the observation Dr. Talksalot.

Space-Time
Didn’t Einstein say this years ago?

I’m not sure, but that name sounds Russian. I hear that in Russia they don’t have very good public access to books, outside of school, in a public library sense. Or at least they didn’t, maybe they do now. Anyways, that would explain a lot. Come, follow me backwards through time…

Books

Hasn’t humanity learned yet? The things we typically dream and create, on a science fiction/fantasy level, are more or less based on a present or future reality. I don’t know why, but that’s what happens. Asimov imagined little robots in human veins, Orwell created the modern day security system, Wells typified a robot extistence in the future, and others envisioned traveling to the moon and beyond. Any of those sound familiar? Let’s take a look at space-time throughout literature, and why this scientist guy is a little slow.

“Lord of the Rings” [approx. 1938]

Have you heard of these books? They’re not very popular, and semi-unknown, but they’re written by a guy named J.R.R. Tolkien a very long time ago. Before computers were even imagined. There are some characters in these books, called “elves”, and one of their main characteristics are their long life, which in fact is an immortal life. If you read these books closely, and maybe some of the associated ones that are even more unknown (like “The Rillanon” for example), you find that the elves do not believe in space-time as we know it… but rather that time is more akin to a circle. Additionally, the wizard “Gandalf” is very obviously seen playing with space-time when he magically reappears from being dead/falling-through-a-never-ending-hole-with-a-giant-demon-monster.

WoW
“WoW” is a blatant theft from Tolkien. Wow.

“Ender’s Game” [1985]

By Orson Scott Card, this is another book that is slightly underground. Few have heard of it, even fewer have read it. The main gist of the story is that there’s aliens attacking humanity, and we fight back via some pre-teens who have a higher IQ than anyone in the world. Towards the end of the book, the main character (”Ender”) communicates with the enemy of future-past through his dreams… and in doing so is not only communicating across thousands of light-years, but also time.

“Dune” [1965] (and the rest of the series)

Frank Herbert. A man with a vision that no-one reads. What a shame. Long story short (and without getting into many complicated details like unpronounceable character names), across many many books one of the main characters from the first turns himself into a god via some sand-based lifeforms. He then marries his sister. Odd things continue down this line until he becomes immortal. Eventually he dies. And then is reborn / goes into the past to change things. That’s really the best I can do in a few sentences.

Edit: Apparently I need to re-read Dune, “go back in time” doesn’t apply here. But he does live a really really long time. And the books are still awesome.

Whowhatnow?

I really don’t think I can make this any clearer without listing every popular and groundbreaking scifi/fantasy novel ever written: those of use of at least average intelligence have considered the possibility of space-time being non-linear… Hell, even Star Trek touched on it at least once a season. The scifi/fantasy community will be happy to know that you finally are able to prove what many of us have already believed in, but your ideas and concepts are by no means original. Even the Bible, “written” at some point 2000 years ago, has a space-time issue.

Nerd
Nerds: “You depend on us … don’t fuck with us.”

I’m not trying to be harsh or mean, but instead I’m realistic. But when you discover how to travel through time or how to visualize/interact with the 4th dimension (quantum physics, anyone?), I will be truly excited.

And I bet many other nerds, geeks, dorks, and non-norms will be too.