across the network: Kyle Brady: Blog  |  Kyle Brady: Fiction  |  Kyle Brady: Status  |  Kyle Brady: Stream  |  Kyle Brady: Projects  |  Kyle Brady: Profile contact
across the internet: on Twitter | on Facebook | more...

Self:

Judas Priest and Me



subscribe to Self posts:  rss - email



If you've paid attention to this blog for a little while now, you probably know that I'm a big metal fan (or "metalhead" as we like to call it).  So it shouldn't be any surprise that I went to a Judas Priest concert this past Sunday...

Judas PriestHeaven and HellMotorheadTestament.  At a huge venue (Shoreline Amphitheatre).

Quite alot of metal, of different kinds, on one bill, and it was amazing.  Priest was, by far the best, but Motorhead was fun to watch ... Lemmy is always hilarious.  The others were interesting too, but I've seen Heaven and Hell before, Dio gets annoying afterwhile and it just drags on.

Anyways, I have two points to make here:

  1. Judas Priest sounds better than they have their entire career.  Ever.

  2. Metal is more than just music.


Older Isn't Always Better

Most bands, especially in metal, don't stand the test of time.  Black Sabbath fell apart, Heaven and Hell looks and sounds tired, Iron Maiden is largely a joke to those under 45, Slayer is less-Slayer than ever before, and even Metallica has been accused of getting old (note:  listen to the new album, then try and say that).

To go outside the realm of metal, The Rolling Stones sound and look like crap, Genesis is gone... the list goes on.

Pick up "Angel of Retribution" and "Nostradamus", both by Judas Priest in the last few years, and tell me they've gone the way of the dinosaur.  Tell me that they sound like crap, changed their sound, or haven't come up with anything original, innovative, or interesting.

You won't, because you can't.

Poke around the 'net, and you'll see alot of discussions of the vitality of this band:  guitars are stronger, faster and more complicated than ever; Halford's vocal range, at both ends of the spectrum, is exponentially greater than anyone else in the industry, including himself from years ago; the quality of their gear adds a more modern tone to even the oldest of their songs; and this list goes on as well.

But none of this really feels important or interesting to most people... until you see them live.

Halford stomps around the stage as if he were a 25 yr. old, stage production is huge and full of crazy stuff, and the rest of the band has an energy that people their age shouldn't have without help from a prescription.  Not to mention flawless execution of the entire set.  Or Halford.

At one point during the show, Halford went from a deep almost Angel Gossow-esque growl all the way up to a glass-shattering pitch that even Pavarotti would have been jealous of.  The entire crowd roared as if Metallica had just announced they were forming a super-group with Slayer and Judas Priest.

The whole point is this:  Judas Priest isn't going anywhere any time soon.  They aren't a "studio band" that can't deliver live because of their age.  Their music isn't "old and tired".  They are still influencing alot of new bands and artists... with music they created 4 years ago.

It's a Community

The other great experience from the show is a perfect example of just how wrong the average metal-hater is about our particular group of diehard fans.  We're typically stereotyped as a bunch of angry, ignorant, juvenile, and anti-social blue-collar racists.  Obviously I'm not, and I can tell you from all the shows I've been to that a statement like that is very far from the truth, but...

I was getting coffee right before Priest came on, since we were outdoors and it was getting a little chilly.  I stopped at a picnic table to stir in some of the powdered creamer, and a girl slightly older than me asked if she could sit down.

We started talking about music, where she's from, etc.  Then her boyfriend came over from getting some food, sat down and joined in.  No "why you talking to my girl, little man?" or anything like that... "hey, how you doin'?  I'm [x]" was actually what happened.

Then a group of three 40+ yr. olds sat down on the other side of the table.  Within two minutes, the 6 of us were discussing bands, industry events (like NAMM), John Petrucci vs. Joe Satriani, etc.

Keep in mind that I'm usually the "strong and silent" type, but that I was having a very in-depth conversation with five random strangers that I probably wouldn't have connected with in "real life".

But that illustrates just what the average non-metal person doesn't see:  being a metalhead is not about bravado, it's about loving something that you truly connect with, and enjoying being part of a very large and diverse community.  A community that, 9 times out of 10, protects it's own.  A community that doesn't swallow stupidity easily, and can hold a more intelligent discussion on the merits of music than most other non-music students in the world.

Do a little research on this.  Talk to people, poke around online... you'll immediately find all the Slipknot fans who are violently angry at any and everyone.  But dig deeper.  Find the true metal fans, of real metal bands.

You'll be surprised.

Self posts are about me (Kyle Brady), in one form or another.
Kyle can be found on Twitter and MySpace, or reached via email.


subscribe to Self posts:  rss - email

submit to reddit Add to Mixx! Share on Facbeook Retweet
Printable Version Printable Version

More Self Pieces

see more...


Commenting Rules

The following is a basic set of rules that are enforced for all commenters.

Any violations of these rules will result in comment deletion, user bans, or both.

  1. No excessively foul language.
  2. No racist remarks.
  3. No SPAMing, unrelated linking, or otherwise unnecessary promotion of outside material.
  4. No trolling.
  5. Be respectful.
  6. Be valuable.
  7. Feel free to respond, argue, or counter-point an article - but do so coherently and intelligently.
  8. Use a personal nickname, commenting account, or moniker. Do not use your business' or website name/account.
  9. Do not trackback/pingback to this post unless your content is relevant.
also available as a standalone page

  • e1even
    i personally find your comment on slipknot fans as being "mad at any and everyone" to be offensive, and an extreme overgeneralization. if you were to
    look into the backgrounds of the individual members, you would find that you would have probably spent a lot of time, and that the songs seem to make a lot more sense.
    i think that people often look to Slipknots heavier side as an OUTLET for anger, and then thats how people view them from that point on, and decide that its the music that made them that way
    as well, the comment on people under 45 being entirely unable to enjoy Iron Maiden to be bullshit, i may not listen to Iron Maiden often, but i always enjoy them when i do.
  • Thanks for playing.

    --Kyle
  • e1even
    so... no constructive/destructive criticism as ive seen so often on this blog? your willing to tear down a girl because she doesnt agree with your opinion on twilight, but when it comes to music and a SLIPKNOT fan being not completely vicious towards everybody, you've got nothin?
    i think you MAY have just lost this one
  • Fine you want it? Don't say I never placed nice.

    1) Slipknot is heavy only in the sense that they downtune guitars and scream about things like rape. This does not make them truly "heavy".

    2) It's not an outlet for anger when you get heavy play on MTV and rock radio

    3) Slipknot fans are notorious for being some of the least educated, loudmouthed, ugliest people in the world that are, very truly, mad at any and everyone - especially if you criticize the band. Other metal fans will defend their favorite band, but only Slipknot fans will get completely violent over criticisms. If you need proof of this, just look at my "Why Slipknot Sucks" post from two years ago - the comments are priceless, and I even left them all there instead of removing them like I normally would.

    4) I've yet to meet someone younger than 40 who is a diehard Maiden fan. Maybe they recognize the value of the band, or its legacy... but they're not a fan. Or a fan's-fan. The music is outdated and hasn't adapted to modern times, unlike the newest Judas Priest releases.s

    5) Your English skills suck. "if you were to look into the backgrounds of the individual members, you would find that you would have probably spent a lot of time, and that the songs seem to make a lot more sense." That's only half a sentence.

    --Kyle

    p.s. Twilight sucks just as much as Slipknot. It' not opinion, it's fact. And they suck for many of the same reasons.
  • e1even
    I hate Twilight just as much as you do, i honestly think twilight is the gayest piece of crap that has ever come around.
    i DID read your post on "Why Slipknot sucks" and i laughed my ass off several times at the comments, BUT you have to admit that there ARE some valid points in them. however, im not going to take the time to go and copy and paste the GOOD points that they made.
    personally, i think they are just angry people, but thats just me.
    I admit that im not a diehard Iron Maiden fan. I personally like some of their most popular songs, such as Number of the Beast, Run to the Hills, 22 Acacia Avenue, etc.
    and why do you comment on my English skills? Of ALL the comments people have made on your website, you choose to pick on ME?
    going back a couple points, some of my friends are diehard slipknot fans, and some of the SMARTEST and QUIETEST people in my school. You're using over generalizations to try to make a point, and though i DO know that some slipknot fans are undoubtedly stupid and loud, not ALL of them ARE
blog comments powered by Disqus
Kyle Brady: Blog
coherent thoughts on diverse topics


Site Navigation:
About Columns Ethics Rules Contact