<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Musings on SciFi Book Length &#91;Self&#93;Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kyle-brady.com/2009/01/03/musings-on-scifi-book-length/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kyle-brady.com/2009/01/03/musings-on-scifi-book-length/</link>
	<description>coherent thoughts on diverse topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:11:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Brady</title>
		<link>http://www.kyle-brady.com/2009/01/03/musings-on-scifi-book-length/#comment-2524</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kyle-brady.com/?p=1030#comment-2524</guid>
		<description>Hi Mary,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All very true.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Charles Stross pretty much started this debate [ &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2008/12/why_are_sf_and_fantasy_novels.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/200...&lt;/a&gt; ], which continued in the comments on his blog, and blogs elsewhere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But it&#039;s not a new debate... Stross just added his authority/weight to the argument, which seemed to be pretty successful at gaining attention for the &quot;Issue&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--Kyle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mary,</p>
<p>All very true.</p>
<p>Charles Stross pretty much started this debate [ <a href="http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2008/12/why_are_sf_and_fantasy_novels.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/200.." rel="nofollow">http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/200..</a>. ], which continued in the comments on his blog, and blogs elsewhere.</p>
<p>But it&#39;s not a new debate&#8230; Stross just added his authority/weight to the argument, which seemed to be pretty successful at gaining attention for the &#8220;Issue&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8211;Kyle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Fagan</title>
		<link>http://www.kyle-brady.com/2009/01/03/musings-on-scifi-book-length/#comment-2523</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Fagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kyle-brady.com/?p=1030#comment-2523</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you. In fact, ANY book should be as long as it takes to tell the story. Look how long the Harry Potter books got. Were we bored? No! Even after Page 926 I hated to see it end.  Same with Christopher Paolini&#039;s 4-book Inheritance trilogy.  He made a live video on his website explaining that the story just wasn&#039;t ready to end, and that even though he loved long books there was a limit as to how much one volume could reasonably cover.  Who the heck was debating the &quot;con&quot; side of long books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m with you. In fact, ANY book should be as long as it takes to tell the story. Look how long the Harry Potter books got. Were we bored? No! Even after Page 926 I hated to see it end.  Same with Christopher Paolini&#39;s 4-book Inheritance trilogy.  He made a live video on his website explaining that the story just wasn&#39;t ready to end, and that even though he loved long books there was a limit as to how much one volume could reasonably cover.  Who the heck was debating the &#8220;con&#8221; side of long books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Brady</title>
		<link>http://www.kyle-brady.com/2009/01/03/musings-on-scifi-book-length/#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kyle-brady.com/?p=1030#comment-923</guid>
		<description>Hi Mary,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All very true.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Charles Stross pretty much started this debate [ &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2008/12/why_are_sf_and_fantasy_novels.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/200...&lt;/a&gt; ], which continued in the comments on his blog, and blogs elsewhere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But it&#039;s not a new debate... Stross just added his authority/weight to the argument, which seemed to be pretty successful at gaining attention for the &quot;Issue&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--Kyle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mary,</p>
<p>All very true.</p>
<p>Charles Stross pretty much started this debate [ <a href="http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2008/12/why_are_sf_and_fantasy_novels.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/200.." rel="nofollow">http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/200..</a>. ], which continued in the comments on his blog, and blogs elsewhere.</p>
<p>But it&#39;s not a new debate&#8230; Stross just added his authority/weight to the argument, which seemed to be pretty successful at gaining attention for the &#8220;Issue&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8211;Kyle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Fagan</title>
		<link>http://www.kyle-brady.com/2009/01/03/musings-on-scifi-book-length/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Fagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kyle-brady.com/?p=1030#comment-922</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you. In fact, ANY book should be as long as it takes to tell the story. Look how long the Harry Potter books got. Were we bored? No! Even after Page 926 I hated to see it end.  Same with Christopher Paolini&#039;s 4-book Inheritance trilogy.  He made a live video on his website explaining that the story just wasn&#039;t ready to end, and that even though he loved long books there was a limit as to how much one volume could reasonably cover.  Who the heck was debating the &quot;con&quot; side of long books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m with you. In fact, ANY book should be as long as it takes to tell the story. Look how long the Harry Potter books got. Were we bored? No! Even after Page 926 I hated to see it end.  Same with Christopher Paolini&#39;s 4-book Inheritance trilogy.  He made a live video on his website explaining that the story just wasn&#39;t ready to end, and that even though he loved long books there was a limit as to how much one volume could reasonably cover.  Who the heck was debating the &#8220;con&#8221; side of long books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
