across the network: Kyle Brady: Blog  |  Kyle Brady: Fiction  |  Kyle Brady: Status  |  Kyle Brady: Stream  |  Kyle Brady: Projects  |  Kyle Brady: Profile contact
across the internet: on Twitter | on Facebook | more...

Expose:

Rush Limbaugh’s Idiocy



subscribe to Expose posts:  rss - email



I was browsing Rush Limbaugh's page last night (because I sent him an email about my Obama post the other day, hoping to provoke a reaction, so I was looking for some sort of response), and came across this bunch of nonsense:

rushidiocy



Essentially, he's attacking President Obama for the decisions he's made regarding Chrysler recently.  I don't support the massive amounts of money that we've given the U.S. auto industry, to little effect, but I still respect Obama as our President.  I like him, yes, but even if I didn't I would respect him and his office.

Limbaugh apparently doesn't feel the need to treat him with any modicum of respect.  Here's the highlighted excerpts transcribed:
"Barack Peron", "Argentina-Style", "Left-wing fascism coming out for Chrysler", "I heard all about the enchanted question, and that's what happens with the feminization of our culture", "president Barack Peron", "What this means is that the laws of economics cannot be changed.  Liberalism is a failure."

I honestly wonder why people pay him to spout such nonsense.  What advertisers would want to be known for supporting him?  He compares our President to a legitimately fascist regime (I wonder if Limbaugh can even properly define "fascism"), assaults the culture at large (Are we all supposed to be gigantic fatass idiots like him?  Is that what being "male" is?), and then somehow associates the auto-industry's failure directly with economics and liberalism.

I could spend hours dissecting how wrong he is on almost every point (not to mention the horrible scare-tactic Photoshop job he included), but there's one flaw worth pointing out...

Ronald Reagan, the supposed darling of the GOP (including Limbaugh) at the moment, was a Republican.  But by today's standards, he would be considered a Democrat, or at least a "liberal".  If you want to scream and cry about this, consider what our party system's history looks like.

Chrysler's failure (along with the rest of the economy) is not a failure of our current President, nor is it a failure of a loose collection of ideas known as "liberalism" - it is, in fact, a direct result of deregulation, lack of oversight, and attempting to have a true free-market economy.  Even disregarding that his party created this whole mess while in power in the first place, at the end of the day he's insulting (by indirect association) what he claims to believe in.

Expose pieces are irregular posts attempting to hold people and organizations accountable for their actions.
Kyle can be found on Twitter and MySpace, or reached via email.


subscribe to Expose posts:  rss - email

submit to reddit Add to Mixx! Share on Facbeook Retweet
Printable Version Printable Version

More Expose Pieces

see more...


Commenting Rules

The following is a basic set of rules that are enforced for all commenters.

Any violations of these rules will result in comment deletion, user bans, or both.

  1. No excessively foul language.
  2. No racist remarks.
  3. No SPAMing, unrelated linking, or otherwise unnecessary promotion of outside material.
  4. No trolling.
  5. Be respectful.
  6. Be valuable.
  7. Feel free to respond, argue, or counter-point an article - but do so coherently and intelligently.
  8. Use a personal nickname, commenting account, or moniker. Do not use your business' or website name/account.
  9. Do not trackback/pingback to this post unless your content is relevant.
also available as a standalone page

  • James
    Rush Limbaugh is an entertainer, not a political thesaurus. The picture is entertaining.
  • Maybe, but he would disagree with you.

    And many of his "loyal listeners" would as well, if they even grasped the concept.

    --Kyle
blog comments powered by Disqus
Kyle Brady: Blog
coherent thoughts on diverse topics


Site Navigation:
About Columns Ethics Rules Contact