<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kyle Brady:  Blog &#187; NBC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kyle-brady.com/tag/nbc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kyle-brady.com</link>
	<description>coherent thoughts on diverse topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.kyle-brady.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
<cloud domain='www.kyle-brady.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>The Death of Television Journalism Has Arrived &#91;OpEd&#93;</title>
		<link>http://www.kyle-brady.com/2010/03/18/the-death-of-television-journalism-has-arrived/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kyle-brady.com/2010/03/18/the-death-of-television-journalism-has-arrived/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Brady</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpEd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kyle-brady.com/?p=5503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN, a once respectable television news station, has been chasing the revenue-rich/value-poor niche of infotainment for at least the last two years, and they’ve finally placed the nail in their own journalistic coffin by hiring their version of right-wing commentator that spews conspiracy theories, racism, misogyny, and general hatred on a regular basis.  His name [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>CNN</em>, a once respectable television news station, has been chasing the revenue-rich/value-poor niche of infotainment for at least the last two years, and they’ve finally placed the nail in their own journalistic coffin by hiring their version of right-wing commentator that spews conspiracy theories, racism, misogyny, and general hatred on a regular basis.  <a href="http://www.alternet.org/media/146070/erick_erickson_is_the_new_cnn_go-to_bigot,_misogynist_and_homophobe">His name is Erick Erickson</a>, and he is the <a href="http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/35511">harbinger of death for television journalism</a>.<br />
<br />
In the era of <em>FOX “News”</em>, celebrity obsessions, false controversies, partisan politics, and many more problematic issues, the death of <em>CNN</em> is a truly sad moment.  It is, however, not a great surprise, as the actual delivery of journalistic content via television has been in great decline for the last decade, attacked by both budgetary and editorial concerns – there’s greater revenue in pursuing popular topics, such as celebrity nonsense or endless coverage of meaningless events, than there is in investigation, so there remains a disturbing kernel of logic to these actions.<br />
<br />
Regardless of whether <em>CNN</em>’s decisions are simply good business, they have placed the majority of the American people in a position that leaves them absolutely without any dependable and legitimate news source.  <em>ABC</em>,<em> CBS</em>, and <em>NBC</em> have long written themselves out of the picture, for both morning and nightly news, and <em>FOX “News”</em> is a scary farce – this leaves only <em>MSNBC</em> and <em>PBS</em> standing.  <em>PBS</em>, although a producer of great journalistic content, has never achieved mainstream popularity, possibly due to their dedication to actual news, and it remains unlikely to become suddenly popular with a younger generation that has short attention spans and a disinterest for most of life.<br />
<br />
Besides the sometimes-valuable news programs like <em>60 Minutes</em>, which is also not watched by the most important demographics, <em>MSNBC</em> is the only major news network that can be counted on to deliver actual reporting – and even it has a bias.  Unlike <em>FOX “News”</em>, <em>MSNBC</em>’s liberal slant does not go so far as to intentionally misinterpret news, events, and raw data, much less produce offensive tirades, but it does exert itself in the issues covered and in the commentators, such as the wonderful <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/">Keith Olbermann</a>.  There is a substantial difference between having a bias and letting that bias overrun reason.<br />
<br />
Unless a greater number of Americans begin listening to the venerable <em>NPR</em>, a source of unbiased, intelligent news and commentary, the nation is on the brink of an awareness decline:  when news programs no longer deliver news, and newspapers are not read, the populace becomes more partisan, less informed, and, above all, less willing to act as a nation.<br />
<br />
Welcome to the era of individualism and ignorance.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kyle-brady.com/2010/03/18/the-death-of-television-journalism-has-arrived/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;NBC&#8217;s Olympic Failure As A Breaking Point&#8221; &#91;Self&#93;</title>
		<link>http://www.kyle-brady.com/2010/03/06/nbcs-olympic-failure-as-a-breaking-point/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kyle-brady.com/2010/03/06/nbcs-olympic-failure-as-a-breaking-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Brady</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Self]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technotainment Revelations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[True/Slant Column]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kyle-brady.com/?p=5485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New column at Technotainment Revelations on True/Slant:
Any Americans that paid even remote attention to the recent 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver would know that NBC royally screwed up.  Skipping events, giving only selected highlights, delaying coverage until primetime, annoying commentators/voiceovers, a lack of Internet coverage – these are just some of the problems that plagued [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[New column at <a href="http://trueslant.com/kylebrady/2010/02/27/nbcs-olympic-failure-as-a-breaking-point/"><em>Technotainment Revelations</em> on <em>True/Slant</em></a>:<br />
<blockquote>Any Americans that paid even remote attention to the recent <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Winter_Olympics">2010 Winter Olympics</a> in Vancouver would know that <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/2010/02/nbcs_olympic_coverage_manages.html?sc=fb&amp;cc=fp"><em>NBC</em> royally screwed up</a>.  Skipping events, giving only selected highlights, delaying coverage until primetime, annoying commentators/voiceovers, a lack of Internet coverage – these are just some of the problems that plagued their television coverage, upsetting <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100217/1511548205.shtml">average citizens</a> and <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100301/0252398339.shtml">Congressmen alike</a>.  This is the moment of revolution.</blockquote><br />
<a href="http://trueslant.com/kylebrady/2010/02/27/nbcs-olympic-failure-as-a-breaking-point/">Go check it out</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kyle-brady.com/2010/03/06/nbcs-olympic-failure-as-a-breaking-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Importance of Conan O&#8217;Brien&#8221; &#91;Self&#93;</title>
		<link>http://www.kyle-brady.com/2010/01/20/the-importance-of-conan-obrien/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kyle-brady.com/2010/01/20/the-importance-of-conan-obrien/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Brady</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Self]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan O'Brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technotainment Revelations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[True/Slant Column]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kyle-brady.com/?p=5361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New column at Technotainment Revelations on True/Slant:
Conan O’Brien, the red-headed leprechaun of late-night television, has been in standoff against the self-harming network known as NBC, and it has brought to light a previously ignored issue:  Coco is not just another late-night host, and his importance to both people and culture is greater than many people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[New column <a href="http://trueslant.com/kylebrady/2010/01/20/the-importance-of-conan-obrien/">at <em>Technotainment Revelations</em> on <em>True/Slant</em></a>:<br />
<blockquote><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conan_O%27Brien">Conan O’Brien</a>, the red-headed leprechaun of late-night television, has been in standoff against the self-harming network known as <em>NBC</em>, and it has brought to light a previously ignored issue:  Coco is not just another late-night host, and his importance to both people and culture is greater than many people realize.</blockquote><br />
<a href="http://trueslant.com/kylebrady/2010/01/20/the-importance-of-conan-obrien/">Go check it out</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kyle-brady.com/2010/01/20/the-importance-of-conan-obrien/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s Next for &#8220;Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles&#8221; &#91;Self&#93;</title>
		<link>http://www.kyle-brady.com/2009/04/15/whats-next-for-terminator-the-sarah-connor-chronicles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kyle-brady.com/2009/04/15/whats-next-for-terminator-the-sarah-connor-chronicles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Brady</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Self]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SHO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terminator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kyle-brady.com/?p=1869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The word on the street is that "Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles" has been canceled.  As much as this absolutely sucks and is in line with the entire history of anything good FOX has ever produced, it was semi-expected because FOX is a network that cares more about obscene big-ticket ratings than the value they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2009/4/15/fox-reportedly-terminates-sarah-connor.html">The word on the street</a> is that "Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles" has been canceled.  As much as this absolutely sucks and is in line with the entire history of anything good FOX has ever produced, <a href="http://www.kyle-brady.com/2009/04/13/terminator-sarah-connor-chronicles-finale-thoughts/">it was semi-expected</a> because FOX is a network that cares more about obscene big-ticket ratings than the value they put out.<br />
<br />
The way I see it, <em>TSCC</em> as a collective has three options for their future:<br />
<ol><br />
	<li><strong>Suck up to the FOX execs and hope things change at some point in the near future, maybe coming back in Spring '10. </strong>While this has happened in the past (<em>Family Guy</em>, anyone?), it's similar to betting all your money on the exact time and date Jesus returns for the Coming of the Apocalypse.  I'm not saying it's (Jesus) ever happening, but still.</li><br />
	<li><strong>Find a bunch of money from a group of rich people, self-fund a full production of Season 3, and release it to DVD.</strong> I think this is a great idea, and would pave the way for the further collapse of the TV network paradigm, assuming they could raise enough money to continue the same level of writing, production, special effects, acting talent, etc.  However, realistically, this is improbable.  Unlikely, even.  (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pink_Panther_(character)">Pink Panther nod!</a>)  We're talking about a huge amount of money spent from idea to DVD printing, and the series would sell for $50, at most, per copy.  The number of copies sold would have to be astronomical to even break even.</li><br />
	<li><strong>Pull up the tent stakes from the FOX battleground, and shop the idea to other networks.</strong> <em>TSCC</em> has proven to have a nothing-if-not-loyal fanbase, just not with the gigantic numbers that could compete with brain-addling crap like <em>American Idol</em> that is so inexplicably popular among the low-to-average IQ range of American citizens.  HBO and Showtime produce shows for a much smaller audience (comparatively), but seem to have no problem doing so, presumably because they produce revenue directly instead of being "OMG we need a larger audience!"-advertising dependent.  Writers, acting talent, and everyone else could move over... as long as FOX will release the rights to its production, which is the biggest "if".</li><br />
</ol><br />
<strong>Option 3</strong> is likely the one with the best outcome, and I really hope it happens.  NBC could even potentially be approached for another season, since they have their fair share of violent "speculative fiction" shows already, and have a history of being more tolerant in ratings swings.<br />
<br />
Here's the takeaway:<br />
<br />
<em>TSCC</em> Crew, please talk to some other networks about immediately continuing production for their network, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">without any changes</span>.  We will follow you to your endpoint, even if it's FX.<br />
<br />
FOX, give up the rights to the show's future.  If you don't want to do another season, at least be reasonable about it, and let someone else who cares about the people that are considered their customers.<br />
<br />
--- --- ---<br />
<br />
<strong>Update (4/15/2009 2:50pm PST):</strong> <a href="http://io9.com/5213470/dollhouse-and-terminator-really-not-canceled-yet-say-insiders">Apparently TSCC's producers are saying it isn't canceled yet</a>, and that the information floating around the 'net is faulty... and the "reporter" has a history of bad-mouthing TSCC.  Let's hope.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kyle-brady.com/2009/04/15/whats-next-for-terminator-the-sarah-connor-chronicles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
